Consciousness Media interview of Acharya S image
Online video
 "You can

donate help
Truth Be Known logo with the Egyptian goddess Maat's Feather of Truth
religion mythology archaeology history astrotheology archeoastronomy online since 1995

Come join me! Facebook image Come join Acharya on Twitter Acharya on Google+ Acharya's Youtube channel Acharya on Linked In Acharya on Tumblr

Neith, Virgin Mother of the World

Neith-Isis, Virgin Mother Goddess of Egypt, with shuttle on her head; 'A Handbook for Travellers in Lower and Upper Egypt.' London: John Murray, 1888; p. 082a

The worship of the Egyptian goddess Neith, a sometime mother of the solar deity Horus, is traceable to around 7,000 years ago, according to Dr. Wim van Binsbergen, chairman of the Foundations of Intercultural Philosophy at Erasmus University, who calls her an example of "female parthenogenetic cosmogenesis." (van Binsbergen, 35)

"Neith never engaged in any kind of sexual union; that is, she was eternally a virgin. Yet, as the primordial Being, she was also generative. Thus, in Neith we have one of the earliest appearances of the archetype of the Virgin Mother, the Holy Parthenos, in her original, unadulterated form."

Regarding the very ancient Neith and her parthenogenetic capacity, in her book Virgin Mother Goddesses of Antiquity Dr. Marguerite Rigoglioso remarks:

...Neith was unequivocally portrayed as an autogenetic/ parthenogenetic creatrix in the inscriptions of the middle and late periods in Egypt, a depiction that may have characterized the goddess in her earliest cult as well. She specifically was both creator and "virgin," a being whose peplos, or dress, no one had lifted. As one of the oldest deities of Egypt, who most likely was worshipped throughout ancient Libya, she thus represents one of the earliest appearances of the archetype of the Virgin Mother goddess in the ancient Mediterranean world. (23)

It is important in discussing Neith as autogene, or self-created Virgin Mother...first to establish her preeminence in the Egyptian pantheon. Neith...was one of the oldest of all Egyptian deities and one of the most important divinities during the early historic period. There is strong evidence that her worship was widespread in predynastic times... She is first documented iconographically in the last phase of the predynastic period (c. fourth millennium B.C.E.)... (26)

As a divinity of the First Principle, Neith was an autogenetic goddess who, in the ultimate mystery, created herself out of her own being. Budge notes...that an inscription on a statue of Utchat-Heru, a high priest of Neith, relates that she "was the first to give birth to anything, and that she had done so when nothing else had been born, and that she had herself never been born." We see her autogenetic aspect echoed in both Egyptian and Greek texts. Plutarch...refers to an inscription on her statue in Sais...: "I am everything that has been, and that is, and that shall be, and no one has ever lifted my garment (peplos)."... That in the above-noted Saitic inscription Neith's "garment" remained perpetually "unlifted" is also a sexual reference... The inscription therefore communicates that Neith never engaged in any kind of sexual union; that is, she was eternally a virgin. Yet, as the primordial Being, she was also generative. Thus, in Neith we have one of the earliest appearances of the archetype of the Virgin Mother, the Holy Parthenos, in her original, unadulterated form. (29-30)

Respected Egyptologist Dr. Claus Bleeker concurs with this assessment regarding Neith, remarking in The Rainbow: A Collection of Studies in the Science of Religion (139-140):

It appears that the connection between Neith and the primeval cow has several impolications. Neith is not only a primeval deity but also a goddess of the universe. An echo of the conviction that she exercises the latter function can be heard in the inscription on her statue in Sais, as it is quoted by Plutarch: ["The present and the future and the past, I am. My undergarment no one has uncovered. The fruit I brought forth, the sun came into being."] Her quality as primeval deity is indicated in the explanation of her name which Plutarch offers, i.e.... "I came (into existence) out of myself."... It is confirmed by a line in the myth of creation at Esna, which reads: "apparue d'elle-même" ["appeared from herself"].

The idea that Neith is a goddess who produces life out of herself is also expressed in the notion that she is androgynous.... She has no partner beside her. In Esna she is accompanied by two sons. She is the virgin goddess who procreates children without male assistance.

It is therefore not surprising that she is considered as a creator. (Emph. added)

It should be recalled that Neith is identified in antiquity with both the Greek goddess Athena, who is likewise a parthenogenetic creatrix or virgin mother, as well as Isis, about whom the same can be and is said. Among others, Isis is identified with the constellation of Virgo, the Virgin, likewise in antiquity. There are many such manifestations of the virgin mother, long before Christianity was ever conceived.


Bleeker, Claus J. The Rainbow: A Collection of Studies in the Science of Religion. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1975.
Rigoglioso, Marguerite. Virgin Mother Goddesses of Antiquity. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2010.
van Binsbergen, Wim M.J. "Skulls and tears: Identifying and analysing an African fantasy space extending over 5000 kilometres and across 5000 years" (1998),

Further Reading

Who is the Virgin Mary?
Who is Mary Magdalene?
Was Krishna Born of a Virgin?
Was Krishna's Mother a Virgin?

The Virgin-Born Son of the Sun God

Enter your name and email address below:
Subscribe Unsubscribe
Donate to keep us going!

▪ Apollo the Chrēst?
▪ Apollonius, Jesus and Paul
▪ Astrotheology of the Ancients
▪ Attis: Born of a Virgin on December 25th, Crucified and Resurrected after Three Days
▪ Beddru is Beddou is Buddha
▪ Bone-Box No Proof of Jesus
▪ The Chi-Rho Symbol and Chrestos
▪ Chrestes as Oracle
▪ Chresto in the Suetonius Manuscript Tradition
▪ Chrestos Magical Cup?
▪ Christ Conspiracy Errata
▪ Christ Conspiracy Review
▪ Christ Conspiracy Review
▪ The Christmas Hoax
▪ The Christ Myth
▪ Debunking the Christ Myth?
▪ Did George Washington and Thomas Jefferson Believe Jesus was a Myth?
▪ Dionysus: Born of a Virgin, Killed and Resurrected
▪ Early Church Fathers on Mithraism
▪ Is Easter Christian or Pagan?
▪ The Historical Jesus?
▪ Was Horus Born on December 25th of a Virgin?
▪ Jesus the Druid?
▪ Isis the Chrēst
▪ Jesus in India?
▪ Josephus on Jesus
▪ How Old is Christianity?
▪ Is Jesus a Remake of Osiris?
▪ The Jesus Puzzle
▪ Mithra the Pagan Christ
▪ The Naked Truth
▪ Neith the Egyptian Virgin Mother of the World
▪ Is Noah's Ark Real?
▪ Origins of Christianity
▪ Pliny, Tacitus and Suetonius: No Proof of Jesus
▪ The Problem of Religion
▪ Rebuttal to Dr. Chris Forbes concerning 'Zeitgeist, Part 1'
▪ Is the Shroud of Turin Real?
▪ Is Suetonius's Chrestus a Reference to Jesus?
▪ Sun Lore of All Ages
▪ Suns of God Review | Danny McNeal
▪ Suns of God Review | Dr. Robert M. Price
▪ Virgin Mother Goddesses of Antiquity | A Review by D.M. Murdock | Marguerite Rigoglioso
▪ Was Krishna Born of a Virgin? | Devaki
▪ Was Krishna Crucified?
▪ When Was the First Christmas?
▪ Who was Buddha?
▪ Who was Mary Magdalene?
▪ Who is the Virgin Mary?
▪ ZEITGEIST Sourcebook (PDF)
▪ Les origines du christianisme et la recherche pour Jésus le Christ historique
▪ Los orígenes del cristianismo y la búsqueda del Jesús Cristo histórico
▪ Christ Myth Articles
▪ Religion & Spirituality Articles
▪ Quotes from Luminaries & Lunatics
▪ Politics & Society
▪ Stellar House Publishing Articles

"Murdock's scholarship is relentless! ...the research conducted by D.M. Murdock concerning the myth of Jesus Christ is certainly both valuable and worthy of consideration." —Dr. Kenneth L. Feder, Professor of Archaeology, Central Connecticut State University, Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience In Archaeology

"I find myself in full agreement with Acharya S/D.M. Murdock... I find it undeniable that...many, many of the epic heroes and ancient patriarchs and matriarchs of the Old Testament were personified stars, planets and constellations..." —Dr. Robert M. Price, The Pre-Nicene New Testament

"I can recommend your work whole-heartedly!" —Dr. Robert Eisenman, James the Brother of Jesus and The New Testament Code,

"Acharya S deserves to be recognized as a leading researcher and an expert in the field of comparative mythology, on a par with James Frazer or Robert Graves—indeed, superior to those forerunners in the frankness of her conclusions and the volume of her evidence." —Barbara Walker, The Women's Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets and Man Made God

"...I have found Murdock's scholarship, research, knowledge of the original languages, and creative linkages to be breathtaking and highly stimulating." —Rev. Dr. Jon Burnham, Pastor, Presbyterian Church, Houston, TX

"I've known people with triple Ph.D's who haven't come close to the scholarship in Who Was Jesus?" —Pastor David Bruce, M.Div, North Park Seminary, Chicago,

"Thirty years ago, when in divinity school, I might have had second thoughts about becoming an Episcopal priest if a book like D. M. Murdock's Who Was Jesus? had been available to me." —Bob Semes, Retired university professor of History and Religion, Founder and Executive Director of The Jefferson Center

"Ms. Murdock is one of only a tiny number of scholars with the richly diverse academic background (and the necessary courage) to adequately address the question of whether Jesus Christ truly existed as a walking-talking figure in first-century Palestine." —David Mills, Atheist Universe

Join me



Freethought Gear

Freethought Gear products image

Support this site!